The U.S. Supreme Court granted an emergency request from New Hampshire state officials to restrict how student identification cards are used to verify voter identity.
The decision pauses a lower federal district court order that had permitted local polling officials to evaluate student IDs as supporting identification alongside alternative proof when voters requested a ballot. The unsigned order hands state election authorities a victory as voters prepare for upcoming elections.
The dispute stems from a state law signed by Gov. Kelly Ayotte under which student IDs on their own may no longer be used to verify a voter’s identity. While state law incorporates a safety valve allowing individuals to establish identification through supplementary documentation, voting rights group Coalition for Open Democracy filed suit after state officials interpreted the rule to completely bar student cards under any circumstances. A federal district judge blocked that strict administrative interpretation, prompting state officials and party representatives to seek emergency relief from the justices.
In granting the stay, the court highlighted long-standing judicial precedent discouraging federal courts from altering election procedures in close proximity to an election. The majority noted that lower tribunals should refrain from shifting ground rules close to balloting without extraordinary justification, writing, “This Court has repeatedly emphasized that lower federal courts should ordinarily not alter the election rules on the eve of an election”. The justices concluded that “Here, the District Court did not point to anything that would justify deviating from that principle”.
The ruling reinstates the state’s total ban on student IDs as identification evidence, reversing the brief period during which local poll workers could consider student documentation. Proponents of the legislation maintain the strict identification rules bolster election integrity and prevent out-of-state students from improperly influencing local races. Conversely, voter advocacy groups contend the restrictions impose unnecessary hurdles for college students seeking to cast their ballots.
Editorial credit: Andrew Cline / Shutterstock.com